Do we deserve it?
Published on May 4, 2007 By Texas Wahine In Misc
The Director of Army Staff has proclaimed that henceforth, in all Army correspondence, the word "family" will be capitalized.

From the current ACS/My Army Life Too newsletter:

"...in recognition of the fact that Army Families are a key component of readiness, and shoulder a great burden of sacrifice, supporting their Soldier and often enduring long periods of separation from their loved ones, effective immediately, the word "Families" will be capitalized in all Army correspondence."

"Soldier" is a capitalized word in the Army realm, and I'm sure many of you have noticed that I capitalize it the way most people capitalize the word "God". It may seem insignificant, but I feel it is a small way to show respect for my husband and for all the Soldiers who have served, and who are currently honorably serving our country.

I have heard people say that the family/spouse is "just as much in" as the Soldier and I have heard that military spouses aren't really military and don't understand military culture or service. The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle.

I have heard people say that military spouses are just whiners and that they "knew what they were signing up for when they married their Soldier" and I have heard people say that military spouses are strong, important, and worthy of praise and admiration. Again, maybe the truth is somewhere in the middle.

It is frustrating to sacrifice so much with so little recognition. Most civilians who do not have a close family member who serves or has served in war time don't fully comprehend the depth of sacrifice required for the family members. Everyone vocally supports the Soldier. They pen poems about him (or her), they buy bumper stickers and yellow ribbon magnets, the forward patriotic emails full of praise for the men and women in uniform, they send boxes full of Tuna and Ramen Noodles and crossword puzzles to these upholders of the Constitution (see? another capitalized word).

Often times it's as if military families are invisible. They quietly do their thing and if they do it well, no attention is ever really drawn to them.

Technically, a Soldier doesn't need a family. It's not a requirement for him (or her) to do his (or her) job. Reality, though, is that it's a quality of life issue. The man or woman who enlists likely has some of the same core needs for companionship that most everyone else does. It would be easier for the Army if there were no Army families, but who is going to tell the people who have agreed to willingly sacrifice their lives for the safety and well-being of other families, that they cannot have one of their own?

No doubt, the Army's support of families has cost the taxpayer an incredible amount of money. A single, childless Soldier doesn't need Spouse Employment Assistance or Child Development Centers or Exceptional Family Member Programs or School Liason Officers.

Army families are both necessary for the well-being and success of the Soldier and completely unnecessary and a hindrance to the success of the Soldier.

When we (military families) do our jobs poorly, our Soldier is distracted and anxious or angry. He cannot focus on the mission because he is worried about little Timmy's fights at school or his mother-in-law's power struggle with his wife over when little Suzy should be potty trained. His mind is always on money and the fact that no matter how much he makes, his wife spends more. He wonders why his wife hasn't emailed or answered the phone in 8 days. He is sick of hearing about how so-and-so's wife is sleeping around. He is stressed, tired, lonely, and needs someone he can trust and lean on, and the bad military family not only denies him this, but also adds significantly to his burden.

When we do our jobs well, we are a great asset to our Soldier. Our job is to run all aspects of our homes as flawlessly as possible while our Soldier is away, so as to remove that burden of worry from our Soldier. We are also an important source of comfort, moral support, and encouragement to our stressed out, mission-focused Soldier. We listen when (s)he needs to talk, we repair the broken washing machine with a safety pin and pair of plyers and don't tell our Soldier until we've succeeded in doing so, we assure him or her that the children are well fed and are doing well in school, we let them know that we love them and support them and we are their safe always-there person, we send them care packages and letters and emails and lost first tooths and suggestive photos and Nomex gloves.


Do military families deserve this (token of) respect? Do we deserve a (capital) 'F', as flawed and unnecessary as we are?

I think so.
Comments
on May 04, 2007
LW: Haha. Good point.

I find it interesting that they've chosen to put this out there. It shows a measure of respect similar to that afforded to Soldiers, which I think is nice. Military spouses get a lot crap from civilians, from AD Soldiers, and from other spouses, so it's a nice little meaningless affirmation. LOL.

I agree with you, though. There ARE more important things they could be focusing on.
on May 04, 2007
Military spouses deserve more than a capitol F, they deserve the respect of the entire nation, for it is their family most military is fighting for, be it wives, mothers, fathers, brothers and sisters, children.
on May 04, 2007
Thanks, MM. That's a good point.
on May 04, 2007
I'd prefer a raise.  
on May 04, 2007
Yep, you deserve it. A little appreciation goes a long way.
on May 04, 2007
Tova: LOL. Well, the Army does like to throw money around.

Loca: I think so, too. Not that it changes anything, but it would be nice to be treated as an important part of the whole system instead of as leeches (dependents).
on May 05, 2007
Do we deserve a (capital) 'F', as flawed and unnecessary as we are?


What's the point in being a Soldier (or a Banker or a Farmer or a Mechanic or a Carpender or a Teacher) without Family? I don't see anything unnecessary about them at all -in fact, I see them as the reason for fighting (or banking or farming or repairing or building or teaching...)
on May 05, 2007
Addressing this quote before reading any comments:

"Army families are both necessary for the well-being and success of the Soldier and completely unnecessary and a hindrance to the success of the Soldier."

I have an immense bitterness and resentment towards the military-family-structure in all ways justified and fair and so I generally try to stay away from these threads. I realize that my bias is unusual. However this statement has struck me and it is something that I will add to my aged dusty mental list of pros/cons of a single-soldier military. You have acurately summed up my entire viewpoint: It is a wash.

Now on to the whole capitalize thing. I don't capitalize anyone. Not even my own nick. Everyone is equal and deserves as much recognition for the sacrifices they have made as everyone else. However, if the capital generates a feel-good, great. I just ask you don't hold it against those who don't capitalize.

Thanks for poking around in my gray-matter!

x




on May 05, 2007
Well written, Tex.
on May 05, 2007
Everyone is equal and deserves as much recognition for the sacrifices they have made as everyone else.


Heh, I can dig that xtine since my sacrifice is my sanity, lol. And didja notice I didn't cap xtine? I'm gonna try to remember that.   
on May 05, 2007
oh and one more thought....military families DO get respect, honor, and gratitude. As ye seek so shall ye find.

There are all kinds of support for military families. I've heard that recently it isn't as pleasant as it was when I was exposed to it, and that I cannot begin to fathom. However, as with any other career or job or even meaningless ditch digging, there is purpose and that falls upon the individual to embrace.

It's not the goal, it's the having of a goal. A capital "F" is icing.
on May 05, 2007
I think families get plenty of recognition. What pep talk goes without a "and thank you to the families who made it all possible" clause? Sure, there's plenty of trauma involved, but it's trauma that is part and parcel of being a brother/sister/father/mother. Should families of cancer patients get a capital letter, too? Maybe, but ultimately I think it's beside the point. The family just wants the sick person back again. I don't see how military personnel are different, except inasmuch as they have chosen their vocation. And why would a family be honored because of a choice their relative made?

I don't begrudge a capital "F" to the families if it brings some level of comfort. It's not like it's any more expensive to print them. But I'm not overwhelmed with a sudden sense of "finally" or anything like that. And I certainly don't think it's a question of deserving.

Dan
on May 05, 2007
Ummm, people, please note that it says "in Army correspondence".

No one else is expected to do anything. When the Army puts something out, family will be capitalized.

And I don't agree all people and all jobs are the same. All people and all jobs have their own difficulties, but it's not like the sacrifices and challenges of each blur together and become equal. Some people carry more burden than others.

And dan, I wouldn't dare compare my pain and sacrifice to that of a wife of someone dying of cancer. Their greater suffering, however, does not make my own sacrifices and challenges and hurts invalid.

on May 06, 2007
it would be nice to be treated as an important part of the whole system instead of as leeches



...that gave me quite the mental picture, TW! but seriously, this little bit of recognition is nice. no big deal, but nice.